我在历史课上亲眼目睹了这场辩论。讨论的主题是古巴和卡斯特罗作为共产主义独裁者的崛起。作为一个古巴流亡者的孩子，我听过那些在菲德尔·卡斯特罗独裁统治下生活和遭受苦难的人们讲的故事。我的家人看到成千上万的人在他的指挥下被杀害，古巴人民的处境也因他的政策而受到影响。毫无疑问，因为我个人的成长，我对卡斯特罗和共产主义有偏见。这种极端消极的共产主义经验在很大程度上改变了我对政治意识形态的看法。然而，在课堂上，我的历史老师认为菲德尔·卡斯特罗对古巴和古巴人民产生了巨大的积极影响。我的老师说，卡斯特罗降低了失业率，总体上改善了古巴人民的平均生活条件。就像历史学家一样，我和老师都在分析同一个国家的相同事实，但得出的结论却大相径庭。我们根据自己的个人文化和信仰来权衡证据，并对政权的一般性质得出结论。这个个人例子让我们深入了解了历史学家们为了得出关于历史事件或话题的结论而进行的辩论。历史学家试图以客观的方式解读数据，然而对证据的权衡是主观的，很容易受到历史学家文化的影响。这样，历史学家很少根据相同的事实得出相同的结论，因为每个历史学家都在根据自己独特的个人经历来权衡证据。这些经历和他们文化的各个方面给了每个历史学家一个关于历史话题的预先想法，使他们以不同的方式评价历史事件。
澳洲历史学论文代写:历史辩论
I saw this debate first hand in my history class. The topic of the discussion was Cuba and the rise of Castro as a communist dictator. As the child of a Cuban exile, I have heard anecdotes from people who lived and suffered under the dictatorship of Fidel Castro. My family has seen the thousands of people who were killed under his command and the conditions of the Cuban people because of his policies. Undoubtedly, because of my personal upbringings, I am biased against Castro and communism in general. This extremely negative experience with communism has swayed my opinion about the political ideology to a great extent. However, in class, my history teacher argued that Fidel Castro had a great, positive impact on Cuba and the Cuban people. My teacher claimed that Castro reduced the unemployment rate and generally improved the average living conditions of the Cuban people.Just like historians, both my teacher and I were analyzing the same facts about the same country, yet were drawing drastically different conclusions. We were weighing evidence based on our own personal cultures and beliefs and drawing conclusions about the general nature of the regime. This personal example gives insight to the debates that historians go through in order to come to conclusions about events or topics in history. Historians attempt to decipher data in an objective way, yet the weighing of evidence is subjective and easily influenced by the culture of the historian. In this way, historians rarely come to the same conclusions based on the same facts simply because each individual historian is weighing evidence based on their own unique personal experiences. These experiences and aspects of their culture give each historian a predisposed idea about topics in history that causes them to evaluate events in history in different ways.
