种族隔离的终结，尤其是在学校里，是在1886年最高法院推翻了它的先例，做出了布朗诉教育委员会案的判决。学校和私营企业中所有种族的融合充分发挥了作用。尽管预期会遭到报复，艾森豪威尔总统还是准备颁布一项行政命令，要求所有公立学校向所有种族敞开大门。这最终标志着少数群体之间敌对紧张关系的结束，但并没有停止教室内的紧张局势。社会需要一段时间来克服自我，但在本世纪末，来自少数和多数群体的美国学校迎来了团结的日子。教育是培养有知识和好奇心的人。德克萨斯州的义务教育在17岁结束。当我们从高中毕业时，这是由我们来决定我们是追求更多的知识还是发展技能。然而，除非我们之前的教育背景是积极的，否则我们的学习兴趣将会减弱。经合组织的报告指出，促进终生学习是“最重要的”。然而，美国各地的学校非但没有接受事实，反而受到了似乎分散了学习的过度官僚作风的阻碍。以SAT为例。由于其独特的多项选择题，以及它在大学录取中的决定性影响，SAT在塑造影响方面既具有智力上的全能性。教师被迫“教SAT”，而不是激发学生对知识的兴趣，最终会降低学习环境。这样做，既不能鼓励优等生，也不能支持困难学生。它把发展的好奇心转移到了大学。最终，代价是显而易见的。那些没有上大学的学生被落在了后面。那些上过大学的人，必须学会如何学习。
澳洲留学生作业代写:种族隔离的终结
The end of segregation, especially in schools, was when the Supreme Court overruled its precedent in 1886 with decision in the case of Brown v Board of Education. The integration of all races in schools and private businesses was in full effect. Though retaliation was expected, President Eisenhower was prepared with an executive order for all public schools to open their doors to all races. This ultimately marked the end of hostile tension between minority groups but did not cease the tension within the classroom. It took time for society to over overcome its ego but the day of unity in schools across America from minority and majority groups came towards the end of the century.Education is about fostering the intellectual and curious ones. Mandatory schooling ends at age 17 in Texas. When we graduate from High School, it’s up to us to decide whether we pursue greater knowledge or develop skills. However, unless our preceding educational background is positive, our interest in learning will weaken. TheOECD report notes that facilitating lifelong learning is “paramount”. Yet, instead of embracing the facts, schools across America are hampered by an excessive bureaucracy that seems to diffuse learning. Take the SAT. With its distinct multiple-choice question and its defining influence in college admissions, the SAT is both intellectually omnipotent in its shaping impact. Teachers are forced to “teach the SAT” rather than sparking interest in knowledge and ultimately diminishes the learning environment. In doing so, it fails to encourage exceptional students and it fails to support struggling students. It defers developmental curiosity to college. In the end, the costs are clear. Those students who don’t go to college, are left behind. Those who do go to college, have to learn how to learn.
