在这篇文章中，作者提到了法律教师的指导和社会化，并解释说，通过研究发现，可以得出结论，法学院和他们的教员需要改变在他们的学校里进行辅导的方式，这主要是为了应对教师队伍中日益增加的多样性。该研究的重点是在法律教师中对“有色人种”女性进行组织辅导的迫切需要。关于这个建议，可以认为这篇文章对男性有偏见，而且种族歧视问题也可以发挥作用。作者在本文中有一个非常明确的关注点;但是文章本身并没有提供本文所包含的研究的参考文献。这让读者感到困难，就好像他们想要对这篇文章做深入的研究一样，这将是非常困难的，因为没有提供参考文献。虽然这篇文章是相当深入的，但是作者还是非常依赖于对文章的讨论所进行的各种研究的发现。我的结论是，我同意作者使用叙述账户和研究结果，以支持他们对促进发展和社会化的指导模式的讨论，但在高等教育背景下，这些信息来源可能不足以支持他们的讨论。
澳洲墨尔本论文代写:法律教师的指导和社会化
In the article the author refers to mentoring and socialization among the Law faculty' and explains that through research findings it could be concluded that 'law schools and their faculties will need to alter how mentoring occurs within their schools, largely in response to the increasing diversity on faculty ranks. The research focuses on the urgent need for organizational mentoring for females who are 'of colour' in the law faculty. In relation to this suggestion, it could be argued that the article is being biased against males and also the issue on racial discrimination can come into play. The authors do have a very clear focus in this article; however the article itself fails to provide references of the researches which have been included in the article. This making it difficult for the reader, as if they wanted to do an in-depth research on the article it would be very difficult as no references have been provided. Although the article is quite thorough, the author does rely heavily on the findings of the various researches which have been carried out in reflection to the discussion of the article.I have concluded that I agree with the author's use of the narrative accounts and research findings in order to support their discussion on mentoring models that promote development and socialization, within the higher education context, however, these sources of information may not be enough to support their discussion.
如果您在墨尔本读书，需要代写服务，可以联系我们的客服，或查看 墨尔本论文代写
