西方的虚伪是修辞的一个重要组成部分。正是通过这种虚伪，他们才成功地建立了一个理想的面孔，在回家的时候，对世界其他地方都是残暴和无知的。他们已经确立了自己的领导地位，现在的角色已经从统治者的统治转变为仍然维持统治地位的帮手，旅行叙事在这方面发挥了至关重要的作用。随着时间的推移，偏侧的旅行作家最终毫无疑问消失产生新的公正的旅行作家William Dalyrymple还是帝国怀旧可能感觉指导他们的作品。问题其实不在于表现而非小说的标签给他们，一个读者会认为叙事的东西，实际上已经发生的事情与作者因此书成为一个高智力和第一手经验的人访问了社会真实的再现。读者开始看叙述事实的地方文件。这是明显的关于印度的游记，因此在国家emblematising他们国家所有的三个作家的重复几乎相同的事件和问题。失败的beauracracy，交通规则，可能是正确的，一切都是在VVIP系统表示应有的重要性。然而，并不是每个人都有遇到过这些问题，作者看到了印度通过火车的窗口和平台，只有他开始对印度社会的种姓划分与列车等级制度。所有的三位作家可以看出，其实他们想看到的见证。William Dalyrymple，作为一个历史学家的历史都在德令哈市，他成为了城市的一个崇拜者，当他进入城市的根深。尽管所有的三个代表几乎相同的情景，但显示放大的差距，由历史学家所做的观察视角之间的事实，这是William Dalyrymple，一个印度流散作家，V.S. Naipaul和一个西方作家，Paul Theroux。印度是通过不同的作者，不同的角度看到的是不同的，因此代表。
澳洲商科论文代写:西方的虚伪
The hypocrisy of west has been an important part of their rhetoric. It is through this hypocrisy that they have succeeded in establishing an ideal face back home while being atrocious and ignorant about the rest of the world. They have established themselves as superiors and the role has now transformed with time from that of rulers to the helpers still maintain the supremacy and travel narratives has ever played a vital role in doing that. No doubt with time the prejudiced side of the travel writers has eventually faded out giving birth to new unbiased travel writers like William Dalyrymple but still the imperial nostalgia could be sensed guiding their writings. The problem actually does not lie in the representations but the tag of non-fiction given to them, a reader immediately tends to consider the narrative as something which has actually happened with the authors and thus the book becomes an authentic representation of the visited society by a person of high intellect and the first hand experiences. The reader starts looking at the narrative as the fact file about the place. This is evident in the travel narratives about India, all the three writers’ repeat almost similar events and problems in the country hence emblematising them for the nation. Failure of beauracracy, traffic rules, might is right, VVIP system everything is given a due importance in the representations. However, not everyone has encountered these problems, Theroux has seen India through the window of train and on the platforms and there only he starts comparing the caste division in Indian society with the class system in trains. All the three writers can be seen witnessing what actually they wanted to see. William Dalyrymple, being a historian sees history everywhere in Delhi and he turns up as an admirer of the city as he goes into depth of the roots of the city. Despite of the fact that all three represents almost the same scenarios but the show amplified gap between the perspectives and the observations made by a historian, which is William Dalyrymple, an Indian Diasporic writer, V.S. Naipaul and a western writer, Paul Theroux. India is seen through different perspectives by different authors, hence represented differently.
澳洲商科论文代写:西方的虚伪
