奥登和欧文探索失落的主题来描绘战争的浪费通过使用：重复、意象和重点。在“难民蓝军，奥登用重复在第一节的最后，当它说，“我们不能去了，亲爱的，我们不能去那里，重复使它更尖锐的强调他们无法逃脱自己的国家，因为他们缺乏护照是后来在第二节显示当它指出的问题，“旧护照可办不到，我的亲爱的，旧护照可办不到”，让他们无家可归。“禁用”有生动的比喻，夸大损失如主题，他决不会再怎么苗条的女孩的腰…都碰他喜欢一些莫名其妙的疾病，，他注意到女人的眼睛从他坚强的人，是整个'，使前士兵孤立。强调和夸张的一个例子是在'难民蓝军时，在第十一节中，指出，“在梦中看见一个一千层…没有一个是我们的，我的亲爱的，没有一个是我们的'，一个夸张的是用来强调他们的处境，无家可归，创造的读者的同情。欧文交替使用弱势语言如之间，他的背永远支撑”，他指的是现在的以表明他现在是软弱和无助。并列的纪念和男性的语言时，他指的是过去的如，他会看看短裙的神，突然让读者意识到他失去永远是从前的那个人了。所有这些例子中，他们都仔细观察重合在一起的主体方式：浪费的战争。
澳洲商业论文代写:奥登和欧文
Auden and Owen explore the theme of loss in order to portray the wastefulness of war through the use of: repetition, imagery and emphasis. In ‘Refugee Blues’, Auden uses repetition at the end of the first stanza, when it says,’ We cannot go there now, my dear, we cannot go there’, repetition makes it more poignant as it emphasises the problem that they cannot escape their own country as they lack passports which is later revealed in the second stanza when it states, ‘Old passports can’t do that, my dear, old passports can’t do that’, leaving them homeless. ‘Disabled’ contains vivid imagery which exaggerates the theme of loss such as, ‘he will never feel again how slim girls’ waists are…all of them touch him like some queer disease’, and, ‘he noticed how the women’s eyes passed from him to the strong men that were whole’, making the ex-soldier socially isolated. An example of emphasis and exaggeration is in ‘Refugee Blues’ when, in the eleventh stanza, it states, ‘Dreamed I saw a building with a thousand floors…not one of them was ours, my dear, not one of them was ours’, a hyperbole is used to highlight their situation, homelessness, creating sympathy for the reader. Owen alternates between using vulnerable language such as, ‘his back will never brace’, when he refers to the present in order to show that he is now weak and defenceless. The juxtaposition of remembrance and the masculine language when he refers to the past such as, ‘he’d look a god in kilts’, abruptly makes the reader realise that he is lost and can never be the man he once was. All of these examples coincide together in the way that they all scrutinize the subject: wastefulness of war.
