湿婆虽然体现了同样的力量和相同的地位，但与他发生的事件的方式发生了改变。Ganesh，传统上认为是Shiva自己的儿子是在这里作为一个孩子，受到Sati、Shiva的妻子，他们结婚之前。所以，我们看到的是，特里帕蒂在与传统的神话，我们知道，已经显示出他的人物不是Tripathi神但人。Shiva，正念，卡利，Ganesh，Kartik，他们都有人可信的形式与他们在Vedas和古史他们具有超自然的力量投射。湿婆是藏族部落的首领，其他人也有人类的形式。然而，这些人的子孙了，太完美的人。例如，湿婆是道德上正确的。他与Sati的关系是不作为，人类可能有激情的关系。因此，我们可以说，一个传统的湿婆神具有不受侵犯的特里帕蒂的价值观。他是个神一样的人。因此，我们看到的是一个好的特里帕蒂自己的想象和传统古印度神话中的平衡。
澳洲商业论文代写:力量和相同
Shiva although embodies the same power and same status but the manner in which events associated with him takes place are altered. Ganesh, traditionally believed to be Shiva’s own son is shown here as a child bore by Sati, Shiva’s wife, prior to their marriage. So what we can see is that Tripathi plays with traditional mythology that we know about.Also, Tripathi has shown his characters not as Gods but as humans. Shiva, Sati, Kali, Ganesh, Kartik, they are all there in human believable form unlike their projection in Vedas and Puranas where they had supernatural powers. Shiva is the chief of a Tibetan tribe and others also have human forms. However, these humans that Tripathi depicts are too perfect for being a human. For example, Shiva is always morally correct. His relationship with Sati is never shown as a relationship of passion that a human being might have. Therefore, we can say that the values that a traditional Shiva possess are not violated by Tripathi. He is a God-like person. Thus, we see a fine balance of Tripathi’s own imagination and traditional ancient Indian mythology.
