Assignment help

澳洲社会学代写作业:公共汽车旅行

美国妇女在公共汽车旅行时意外中枪。公共汽车司机去了最近的一个村庄,那里只有一名兽医缝合伤口。但由于失血过多,受伤的妇女仍然需要充分的医疗照顾,所以他们等待着救护车从最近的医院(3小时车程)驶来。与此同时,巴士上的其他游客也想离开这名妇女和她的丈夫(理查德饰演),因为他们担心再次发生袭击(第一次袭击很快被贴上“恐怖分子”的标签),担心天气太热。旅行团和理查德发生了几次争吵,最后导致旅行团在理查德打电话时离开。如果我们把这个例子放到迪尔凯姆之前提到的论证中我们可以看到事故发生后公共汽车群体分裂了。这群人的经历来自外界,在这个案例中就是枪击事件。但是理查德和他的妻子很快就和这个团体分开了;因为现在他们的情绪和目标都不一样了。因此,旅行团拒绝了理查德的建议,离开了。目前还不清楚如果有人开枪的话,这种情况会导致什么后果。每个小组都有一个领队,在电影中由一名英国游客扮演。如果他中弹怎么办?这会产生不同的结果吗?还是只是演员变了,最终结果还是一样?我想结果会因情况的不同而有很大的不同。

澳洲社会学代写作业:公共汽车旅行

American woman got accidentally shot while on the bus tour. Bus driver goes to a nearest village, which only had a veterinarian who sewed the wounds. But the wounded woman still needed full medical care because of severe blood loss, so they were waiting for the ambulance which was driving from the nearest hospital (3 hours away). At the same time other tourists on the bus wanted to leave the woman and her husband (Richard) in the fear of another attack (the first attack was quickly labelled “terrorist”) and concerns over heat. The tour group and Richard engage in several arguments, eventually resulting in tour group leaving while Richard was on the phone. So if we put this example in previously mentioned Durkheim’s arguments we can see that after the accident the bus group was divided. The group’s experience originated from outside, which in this case was the shooting. But Richard and his wife were quickly separated from the group; because now the group did not share same emotion and the same goals. Consequently, the tour group resisted Richard’s arguments and left. It is not certain what would have been the outcome of this situation if someone else would have shoot. Every group has a leader, which in the movie was played by a British tourist. What if he got shot? Would have this made a different outcome? Or just actors change and the end result remains the same? I guess the outcome will vary significantly depending on parameters of the situation.