它可以指出,智慧是知识积累,是由我们的经验。一个清楚的头脑的人类(和充分发展)可以使用积累知识与行动和结果的一组特定的情况下。通过观察孩子们可以看到,没有足够的知识积累将行动的结果。为了获得能够建立这样的行为和结果之间的联系的孩子必须获得经验。在“调查人类理解”大卫。休谟试图发展这一思路。
从过去的事件有可能得出未来通过某些已知什么和什么假设可能之间的连接。大卫·休谟问题推理与推导的过程中如何从过去未来。在他看来所有的想法存在经验的想法产生。如果画面没有经历过的东西不可能有一些个人的观点关于它。例如可能说一些甜的人从来没有甜蜜的东西。这将提供知识的人,是甜蜜的。但是它不传递的理解什么是甜。这样一副画面:必须了解它的基础。如果画面是没有是不可能得到正确的想法。我想有缺陷但直观地理解类比将两人谈论的主题既不理解,主题不能学到的,只有有经验。所以休谟指出预测某些事件,不可能没有类似的经验。他进一步证明知识来自一些因果关系需要经验来解释。它不能来自推理基于现有知识经验(先天)之前发生。
澳洲社会学论文代写:智慧积累
It can be stated that wisdom is accumulated knowledge and is produced by our experience. An aware mind of a human (and sufficiently evolved) being can use the accumulated knowledge to relate action and result of it to a set of particular circumstances. By observing children it is possible to see that there is insufficient amount of knowledge accumulated to link action to the outcome. In order to acquire ability to establish such links between actions and outcomes children must acquire experience. In "An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding" Davide Hume attempts to develop this line of thinking.
It is possible to derive future from past event by drawing certain connections between whats known and whats hypothetically possible. David Hume questions how reasoning is associated with the process of deriving future from the past. In his opinion for all ideas exists previous experience from which ideas are produced. If mental picture of something was not experienced it shouldn't be possible to have some kind of personal view regarding it. For example it is possible to say that something is sweet to someone who never had anything sweet. This would provide knowledge to someone that something is sweet. However it does not convey understanding of what sweet is in any way. A mental picture of something must be a basis for idea about it. If mental picture is absent is it impossible to derive correct meaning of the idea. I suppose a flawed but intuitively understandable analogy would be two people talking about subject neither understands, where subject can not be learned, only experienced. So Hume is stating that predicting some event, is not possible without experience of something similar. Further he proves that knowledge derived from some causal link requires experience to interpret. It can not be derived from reasoning based on some existing knowledge that happens before experience (priori).
