在我的研究中，我发现支持和反对的两方对于政府的公共财政是否与教育相关和有帮助的信念都有值得商榷的因素。我相信，虽然双方都有事实证明，但我同意财政应该用于政府和各州的教育预算。每个公民都应该充分利用受教育的机会，不管他们的经济状况如何，拓宽他们的未来。由于学校系统收到资金，这就提供了供应品和设施的机会，以便创造和购买这些设施，以提供上学和教育机会。支持和反对的因素是税收和税收支出的结果，这造成了两党之间的冲突。虽然很难说一种观点是否优于另一种观点，但我认为，政府在教育上的支出的支持因素与我自己有关。公共教育特别与我有关，因为如果不是因为我的地方政府给我免费教育的机会，我的父母就不会有能力送我去接受高等教育;大学。此外，在支持因素中还陈述了教育改善社区和降低犯罪率等事实证据，这对我们共同的财富和利益是重要的。联邦和州的债务水平已经导致政客们欺骗了他们对教育的信念，以及他们对削减联邦预算的支持。这引发了争论，即当涉及到财政立场时，是否应该把这个问题留给州、地方或联邦政府来解决。如果教育需要一个公民为他们想要的领域装备装备装备，那么我不明白为什么限制为就业所需的技能提供资金甚至是一种选择。如果联邦政府仅限于教育部门，那么这就包括只将联邦学生贷款给私人贷款。联邦政府必须重建他们的教育基金。
澳洲悉尼论文代写:支持和反对
In my research, I found that both of the supporting and opposing sides have arguable factors to their belief in whether or not public financing through the government is relevant and helpful in education. I believe that while both sides do show factual proof of evidence, I agree that finances should be used in the budgeting process of the government and states for education. Each citizen should be given full advantage of an education to broaden their future regardless of their financial situation. As the schooling systems receive funds, this allows an opportunity for supplies as well as facilities to be created and purchased to hold schooling and educational opportunities. The supporting and opposing factors are a result in the expenditures of tax dollars and revenues, which creates the combustion between the two parties. While it is hard to provide whether one argument trumps another, I feel that the supporting factors of government spending on education are pertinent to myself. Public education specifically relates to myself because if it were not for the opportunity to receive a free education through my local government, my parents would not have obtained the ability to send me to receive a higher education; college. Also, in the supporting factors is stated the factual evidence that education improves the communities as well as lowers things such as crime rates which is of importance to our common wealth and good. The federal and state debt levels have led to politicians deceiving beliefs in education as well as their support in reducing the federal budget for them. This has led to controversy about whether the issue should be left to state and local or federal government when it comes to the financial standpoint. If education is what entails a citizen being equipped for their desired field, then I do not see why limiting the money for a skill needed for employment would even be an option. If the federal government is limited in the education department, then that includes the omission of federal student loans to only private loans. Federal government has to rebuild their education funding.
