很明显,立即头脑不知道的事情,但只有通过干预的想法。因此,我们的知识是真实的,只有到目前为止我们的想法和现实之间存在着一致性。但是这里要什么标准?怎能思想,认为只有自己的想法,知道他们自己同意的事情吗?那么谁是正确的?这些只是现实数百人,三种不同的意见,甚至可能数以千计来自其他哲学家,但有没有办法知道如果一个哲学家的理论是正确的在另一个?大多数的这些理论有一个共同点是,我们对现实的看法,我们如何看待事物通过我们的感官和我们看到的不同的物体,可能不是什么肯定是真实的,他们建议我们对现实的看法,并不是真正的现实是什么。这意味着普通人的生活,他们对其他的现实是基于无知的真理。在人类张成的空间,我们作为一个物种有看宇宙的运作通过宗教的镜头,用它来解释解释的。然而,世俗化科学开始表面,因此,科学解释开始取代宗教信仰。以前无知的痛苦对人用宗教来感知周围的世界变成了真理。然而,随着科学和技术越来越先进,先前的科学定理开始被新发现的证明。再次,无知变成真理;尽管如此,每一次无知皈依真理新无知表现。作为一个例子,而在矩阵,Neo不知道他的现实是由一台机器的工作原理。对他来说,他是真实的,吃的东西和拳他面对痛苦。他认为机械世界驻留在现实,是真实的。然而,只要他唤醒新的现实,外面的机器,他之前的生活成为一种过时的事实对他来说,这个新的成为他新的现实。现实是一个循环的真理和无知,并将继续如此永恒。除非你是无所不知的,总是会有一个真理,一个事实存在,将可能证明我们知道的一切。
澳洲哲学作业代写:干预的想法
It is evident that the mind knows not things immediately, but only by the intervention of the ideas it has of them. Our knowledge therefore, is real, only so far as there is conformity between our ideas and the reality of things. But what shall be here the criterion? How shall the mind, when it perceives nothing but its own ideas, know they agree with things themselves? So who is right? These are just three different views on reality out of hundreds, and possibly even thousands from other philosophers, but is there any one way to know if one philosopher’s theory is right over another? One thing most of these theories have in common is that our perceptions of reality, how we view things through our senses and the different objects we see, may not be what is certainly real, they suggest that what our perceptions of reality are, are not really what reality is. What this means is that for the average person living, their reality is based upon ignorance towards other truths. Throughout the span of humanity, we as a species have looked upon the workings of the universe through the lens of religion, using it to explain the unexplainable. However, secularized sciences began to surface and thus, scientific explanations began to replace religious beliefs. What was previously the affliction of ignorance towards the people who used religion to perceive the world around them transformed into a truth. However, as the sciences and technology grew more advanced, previous scientific theorems began to be disproved by newly discovered ones. Again, the ignorance transforms into truth; nonetheless, each and every time ignorance converts to truth new ignorance manifests. As an example in while inside the matrix, Neo had no idea that his reality was created by the workings of a machine. To him, the food he ate was real, and the punches he took in the face were painful. He perceived the mechanical world he resides in to be reality, to be real. However, as soon as he awakens to the new reality, outside of the machine, his previous life became an obsolete truth to him, and this new one became his new reality. Reality is a cycle of truth and ignorance, and will continue to be so eternally. Unless one is omniscient, there will always be a truth, a fact, in existence that will carry the potential to disprove everything we know.
